Case 003· A worked example
This is a worked example, not a real person’s case. The people, the dates and the amounts are made up. The way the record is built is not — that part is how these disputes actually run.
Contractors · raised by the account holder

A bathroom that stopped halfway

The question this answers
What should I write down when a contractor stops work partway through?

The change everyone was relying on was never in the written quote — it was agreed in a group chat about tile colors, and it survived only because one person screenshotted that week’s messages for an entirely different reason.

The situation

Tomas and Bea had a bathroom done. The quote was $9,000, in three stages: $2,000 to start, $4,200 at the waterproofing stage, $2,800 on completion.

They paid the first two. Work ran for about three weeks and then stopped — no walk-off, no argument, just a run of days where nobody came. Messages were answered slowly, then briefly, then not at all.

Five months later the bathroom was finished by someone else. The dispute was never about whether the work stopped. It was about what had been agreed along the way, and $4,200 of it had been agreed in a group chat.

Which way round

They're raising it. That is the easier side to document and the harder side to document well, because the temptation is to record how it felt — three weeks of silence, unanswered calls, the growing sense of being managed.

None of that is the record. What went in the record was: who said what, on what date, and what was paid when.

The feeling is real and it is not evidence. A record that reads as frustration reads as one side of an argument. A record that reads as dates reads as a record.

The record — 18 items over 5 months

as it sits in the register
Item
Their side — the contractor
Your side — Tomas and Bea
February 2026
001
Feb 2
Their side — the contractor
Written quote
$9,000 · three stages · scope listed in six lines
002
Feb 4
Your side — Tomas and Bea
Stage 1 paid
$2,000 · bank transfer · reference kept
003
Feb 9
Group chat started
Contractor, Tomas, Bea · tile and fitting choices
004
Feb 16
Their side — the contractor
Work begins
First day on site · photo of the stripped room
February – March 2026
005
Feb 19
Their side — the contractor
In the group chat: the vanity won't fit the agreed plumbing
Proposes moving the waste · "no extra charge, we'll sort it"
006
Feb 19
Your side — Tomas and Bea
Screenshot of that week's chat
Taken to send her sister the tile choice. The scope change is in the same screenshot by accident.
007
Feb 24
Their side — the contractor
Waterproofing done
Photographed by Bea the same evening, before it was covered
008
Feb 25
Your side — Tomas and Bea
Stage 2 paid
$4,200 · transfer · reference kept
009
Mar 2
Their side — the contractor
Last day anyone attended site
Nothing logged for 3 weeks, Mar 2 to Mar 23. The three weeks of silence are the thing being complained about, and almost nothing was written down while they were happening.
March – April 2026
010
Mar 23
Your side — Tomas and Bea
First written chase
Email · states what's outstanding · asks for a date
011
Mar 27
Their side — the contractor
Reply
"Back next week" · no date given
012
Apr 7
Your side — Tomas and Bea
Second written chase
References the reply of Mar 27 and that nobody attended
013
Apr 9
Their side — the contractor
Reply
Raises the vanity waste as extra work · $1,100
014
Apr 9
Your side — Tomas and Bea
The February screenshot found
Item 006 · the same change, agreed at no extra charge, seven weeks earlier
015
Apr 14
Your side — Tomas and Bea
Position set out in writing
Payments, dates, the screenshot attached · asks for a completion date or a refund of the unworked stage
May – June 2026
016
May 6
Your side — Tomas and Bea
Second contractor quotes to finish
$3,400 · itemized · what was and wasn't done listed
017
May 19
Photographs of the room as left
Twelve, same angles as item 004
018
Jun 11
Settled

What three of those entries actually did

Most items in a record do nothing on their own. These three carried it.

006
The accidental screenshot

Bea took it to show her sister a tile. The scope change — no extra charge, we'll sort it — happens to be four messages further up the same screen. Seven weeks later it is the only surviving record of the one thing genuinely in dispute, because group chats scroll, get muted, get left, and sometimes get deleted by whoever started them. The most valuable item in this whole file was created by accident, for another purpose, by someone who wasn't thinking about the bathroom at all.

007
The waterproofing, photographed before it was covered

Once tiles go on, nobody can see it. Taken the same evening, unprompted, because it looked like progress worth showing someone. It ended up settling what stage the job had actually reached, which was the second thing in dispute and the one that decided the money.

002 + 008
Two payments with their references kept

Dull, and they carry the case. The amounts and the dates are not anyone's recollection; they are two lines on a bank statement. Almost every argument here reduced to what was paid, and what stage had been reached when it was paid — and one half of that was never arguable.

What was missing

2 gaps. None of them sank it, and all of them were avoidable.

01
The three weeks of silence have almost nothing in them
March 2 to March 23. Those three weeks are the entire substance of the complaint, and the record is nearly empty across them. There were phone calls — several — and not one of them is written down. "Nobody came and nobody answered" is exactly the kind of statement that needs dates behind it, and the dates weren't kept, because at the time it still felt like it was about to sort itself out. A silence is the hardest thing to document and the easiest to lose, because while it's happening it doesn't feel like anything is happening.
02
No record of the group chat itself, only one screenshot of it
Item 006 is a single screen from one week. The rest of that chat — five months of tile choices, timings, small agreements — was never exported. When the chat later went quiet it stopped being readable end to end. One lucky screenshot survived out of a conversation that would have answered several other questions.
How it ended

Settled before anyone filed anything. The contractor withdrew the $1,100 claim for the vanity work and contributed $1,900 towards the cost of finishing.

The $1,100 turned on a screenshot taken for a different reason. The rest turned on the two payment references and one photograph of waterproofing that nobody could see any more. What the record could not help with at all was the three weeks of silence — the part that upset them most and the part they'd written nothing down about.

What to take from it — either side of this dispute

Anything agreed in a chat is agreed nowhere. Screenshot or export it the week it happens. Group chats get left, muted and deleted, and the person who can delete it is usually not you.
Photograph what's about to be covered up — waterproofing, framing, wiring, anything that goes behind something else. Same evening, before it disappears. Either side can do this, and a contractor who does it is as protected as the owner.
Log the silence. A week where nothing happened is an entry: called, no answer, 4:15pm. Three weeks of nothing is the most common complaint in this whole category and the least documented, because while it's running it doesn't feel like anything worth writing down.
Keep the payment references with the dates. Not the amounts from memory — the reference. It is the one part of the story nobody can offer a different version of.
Write what happened, not how it felt. The feeling is real. It just isn’t the record, and a file that reads as frustration reads as one side of an argument.
The checklist for this one
What to write down when work on your home goes wrong — both sides
One page, printable, no account.
Keep a record like this one
Free to build, for as long as it takes. You pay when you want the finished file.
Start a record
Terms used on this page
Stage paymentScope changeVariationProgress photograph
Worked example · no real person’s case · no statute cited · education on documenting, not legal advice
Case 003 · published 2026-09-13 · reviewed 2026-09-13